// browse other categories
01
The library that changed frontend development. Component-based, massive ecosystem, backed by Meta.
★ 231.0k
// pros
- Massive ecosystem
- Great job market
- Server components
- React Native for mobile
// cons
- Not opinionated enough
- JSX learning curve
- Needs a meta-framework
02
The React framework. SSR, SSG, API routes, and more. Full-stack React made easy.
★ 128.0k
// pros
- Full-stack framework
- Great DX
- Vercel integration
- App Router is powerful
// cons
- Vercel-centric
- App Router complexity
- Bundle size concerns
03
Cybernetically enhanced web apps. Compiles to vanilla JS with no virtual DOM. Incredibly fast and fun.
★ 80.0k
// pros
- No virtual DOM
- Tiny bundle sizes
- Amazing DX
- Runes are elegant
// cons
- Smaller ecosystem
- Fewer jobs
- Less third-party libraries
04
The progressive framework. Easy to learn, powerful to scale. Great documentation and welcoming community.
★ 208.0k
// pros
- Gentle learning curve
- Great documentation
- Composition API is excellent
- Vibrant community
// cons
- Smaller job market than React
- Ecosystem fragmentation
- Less corporate backing
05
The web framework for content-driven websites. Islands architecture, zero JS by default. SEO dream.
★ 47.0k
// pros
- Zero JS by default
- Island architecture
- Use any UI framework
- Perfect for content sites
// cons
- Not ideal for web apps
- Newer ecosystem
- Limited interactivity patterns
06
Simple and performant reactivity for building user interfaces. Fine-grained reactivity without a virtual DOM.
★ 33.0k
// pros
- Incredible performance
- Fine-grained reactivity
- Familiar JSX syntax
- Small bundle size
// cons
- Small ecosystem
- Few jobs
- Less third-party support
07
The enterprise framework. Full-featured, opinionated, and backed by Google. Signals make it modern.
★ 96.0k
// pros
- Full-featured framework
- Strong typing with TypeScript
- Enterprise-grade
- Signals modernize reactivity
// cons
- Steep learning curve
- Verbose boilerplate
- Heavy initial setup
08
High power tools for HTML. Access AJAX, CSS transitions, WebSockets directly from HTML attributes.
★ 40.0k
// pros
- No JavaScript required
- Works with any backend
- Incredibly simple
- Hypermedia-driven
// cons
- Not for complex SPAs
- Limited ecosystem
- Debugging can be harder
09
Full-stack web framework focused on web standards and modern UX. Nested routing done right.
★ 30.0k
// pros
- Web standards first
- Great data loading
- Nested routes
- Progressive enhancement
// cons
- Merging with React Router
- Uncertain future
- Smaller community
10
The HTML-first framework. Instant-on with resumability — no hydration. Built for speed.
★ 21.0k
// pros
- Instant loading (resumability)
- No hydration needed
- Lazy loading everything
- Novel approach
// cons
- Very new
- Small community
- Different mental model
- Limited ecosystem
Building something with Frontend Frameworks?
Get AI recommendations for your full stack from our ranked tool database.
→ Build your stack